![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Well then just add prefixes specifically for that forum. Just add a prefix for each version of vbulletin 3.x
3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 and make it a requirement for users to assign a prefix for easier problem sorting.
Originally Posted by Paul M
![]()
No members have liked this post.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
what ?
dont be more vb 3.6 ? shit !
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
no offence but allot of sites have not transfered to version 4 or regret doing so because its so POOR. the fact this forum is on 3.6 says it all.
No members have liked this post.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
I am glad you are still allowing those version mods to still be downloaded and discussed. That would have been really bad if you chose to close them down completely.
__________________
Gamerz Needs - For All Your Gaming Needs! No members have liked this post.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Originally Posted by hornstar1337
True, but what about new threads? I think we won't be able to make new modification threads or discussion. ![]()
![]()
__________________
http://vb-spanish.com is releasing soon (help will be appericated). No members have liked this post.
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Originally Posted by Paul M
'old'? that's very short sighted thinking - Has anyone actually thought about this or are 'we' leaving it up to one person who may or may not be aware that there's a huge subscriber base in play here on the 'old' versions? ![]()
![]()
__________________
The Ultimate Sport Touring Portal No members have liked this post.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Originally Posted by Paul M
Are you planning to use the CMS for Mods? ![]()
I really hope so, because if you manage that, then the CMS will be ready for my needs. No members have liked this post.
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Originally Posted by vics
No, of course not. We just woke up one morning and thought "lets do this". ![]()
![]() At no time did we bother to actually research the activity in the old 35/36/37 release forums.
__________________
Former vBulletin.org Staff Member
Cable Forum Please do not PM me about custom work - I no longer undertake any. Note: I will not answer support questions via e-mail or PM - please use the relevant thread or forum. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by Paul M; 04 Dec 2010 at 20:24. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Im not really sure what you mean by this ?
__________________
Former vBulletin.org Staff Member
Cable Forum Please do not PM me about custom work - I no longer undertake any. Note: I will not answer support questions via e-mail or PM - please use the relevant thread or forum. No members have liked this post.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Please don't move on too quickly as it has me concerned for the actual life of vB4 it's going to be over by February '11
No members have liked this post.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
You should not call the combined forum 3.x but rather 3.y, as in "why".
No members have liked this post.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
I could have been clearer. Let me try again:
If I understand it correctly the Modification releases on vb.org are currently in GARS. Do you(vb.org administration) intent to replace GARS with the vbCMS, and migrate the Modification releases to a CMS content type? No members have liked this post.
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I dont know where you get that idea. We dont have GARS, and never have.
Errrr. what ?
__________________
Former vBulletin.org Staff Member
Cable Forum Please do not PM me about custom work - I no longer undertake any. Note: I will not answer support questions via e-mail or PM - please use the relevant thread or forum. No members have liked this post.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
I read that somewhere. Obviously its not true. But the question remains the same. Do you intent to utilize the CMS for Modification Releases?
No members have liked this post.
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
I don't understand why you would close the 3.5-3.7 forums for new mods. I understand a new 3.6 mod is a very RARE occurrence but why turn off new threads (mods)? It doesn't hurt anyone to have them remain enabled- it's not like you can have less 4.x threads because 3.6 forum is open...
I maybe can understand putting the early 3.x mod forums under some 3.x umbrella to "clean up" the look of the site but preventing new mods from being posted just doesn't make any sense. Truthfully the same logic goes to why the 3.0 and earlier mods were ever "archived" (deleted) to begin with but what's done is done... Don't make that mistake again. ![]() This forum itself runs 3.6!
__________________
-Joe Former vBulletin.org Staff Member (@BirdOPrey5) Former vb.org Moderator. Fighting for a free & independent vb.org. BirdOPrey5.com - Exclusive VB Mods! (Formerly Qapla.com) | Joe's Ultimate Off Topic Note - I do not read my PMs often, do not expect quick replies. No members have liked this post.
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|
New To Site? | Need Help? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:17.